“And from this diffidence of one another, there is no way for any man to secure himselfe, so reasonable as Anticipation; that is, by force, or wiles, to master the persons of all men he can, so long, till he sees no power great enough to endanger him”
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan
“Have we – we who have returned – been able to understand and make others understand our experience?”
Primo Levi, The Drowned and the Saved
Hobbes wrote about the need for a Leviathan, a body mightier than humanity itself to rein in our dark flamboyances, being that such excesses often played out in violence, chaos and death. Lest we fall into the trap of mistrusting our neighbours, fearing them and them fearing us in return – a trap in which humanity often falls.
In the 20th Century, we saw Europe fall into the abyss, not once but repeatedly. Over resources, over political ideology, over racial superiority, over colonialism and exploitation. It left a scarred and battered people. Worldwide, the tremors still resound and echo. The war in the Balkans with its stark imagery of concentration camps and bloody ethnic slaughter, the Rwandan tribal genocide and the secretarian conflicts in the Middle East – have we not managed to communicate the experiences of the last century adequately?
Communication is paramount; without clear channels and clearer motives, fear overrides reason. Hobbesian fear, the need to dominate others so we cannot be dominated by them, has its roots in the psychology of groups. With who we identify is a tribal and emotive issue, going back to the dawn of communal life. Regarding the resources of the group, food, shelter and the like; a need for fierce protection from others meant that you and yours could survive. Even at the potential cost of others.
We live in a different world now. A world of nation states and global communications, the world laid bare for all to see. We strive to cooperate in world institutions such as the UN and the IMF. What is Europe and what identity does it realise in 2016?
Beyond the landmass, that continent so recently broken and rebuilt, there is a different vision; of one people living free and peaceably. We people are maintained and nurtured with shared ideas, shared knowledge, cooperation and even freedom of movement. Never before has that Hobbesian fear been so far removed.
Yet it encroaches again in the distance. Our shared heritage across Europe is being forgotten and into the trap we are falling.
When discussing the upcoming EU referendum, my wife and I seemingly cancel each other out. I’m voting to stay in and she’s voting to leave. However, it’s the taking part that counts and it’s integral that everyone who can participates.
If we are to consider returning to a position of us and them; in my wife’s opinion, that the EU is simply too big, too distant and unaccountable politically; then we must consider what we have learnt from the experience. Rather than pretend it has been a giant misunderstanding that we still and will always tribally identify as different regardless of circumstances; we must still look to the future and how to ensure that we, the people of Europe, continue to live peaceably and safely, free from the fear and desire for domination.
I agree with my wife’s complaints, but I want to remain part of the EU. For those institutions we have built between us, the cooperation fostered is of no less intrinsic value, however, politically we need reform. Politicians are meant to represent the people and in forcing distance, they have created anxiety and apathy about their function. They are not representative, nor share a voice.
Even now, it is too easy to say “but Germany says this” or “that France does that”. It is supposed to be “we say this and do that”. That supposed figure, the Leviathan, a benevolent bigger brother has become corrupted through division and inequalities. Fault lines are created and picked at with reckless abandon, tearing away at the work and effort gone into creating this society based not on the mistakes of the last century but on a better vision of what we can be.
Yes, we share the ECHR, a feat of incredible value in ensuring fairness and justice. On the other hand, we deny Scottish fisherman the opportunity to fish locally, whilst allowing Spanish fleets within 50m of the Scottish shoreline. Locally, we’re still being isolated into pockets, dismissed and irrelevant. We are not making sure that everyone has the opportunity to benefit. That discontent is being fostered, illustrates those failings politically and in the vision of a prosperous Europe for all.
Change is needed, not simplistic measures to placate those who would wish to create division, to ensure that they and theirs survive. The focus of the EU must be the people, all of them. It should be robust and relentless in removing division, removing unfairness and cronyism. Let people live freely and safely, forever distant from the experiences of Primo Levi. We must not forget the history of the 20th Century and the understanding that it is easier to appeal to the base nature of the human animal, than it is to cooperate, for the benefit of us all.
Reblogged this on sprintingjournalist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with your wife. Time to leave this failed experiment. I am not a racist, far from it. I am not against taking in refugees, in fact I advocate it. But I voted against going into the EU, the first time, and will vote to leave this time. I fear that we will get the same, possibly rigged, result. But I will be voting to get out of this Euro-Capitalist system. Blighted by Nationalism, a currency we do not share, and a history that can no longer be ignored. My fellow-travellers are few, and mostly alarming. Old-school Tories, the opinionated uneducated, or the Far Right. Few of us are left on The Left, but I will make my mark next week.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great comment and thanks for stopping by.
I agree that the corporate state that the EU has developed into was not the vision they had in the first place for a prosperous Europe for all; somewhere the old nationalisms and animosities wouldn’t find a home.
I’m on the Left; though finding it hard to reconcile the avid post-colonialist view of the leadership. Up here we’ve seen a large amount of EU citizens make the move to Greater Manchester. They integrated well on the whole. The issues locally are far from racist; the UKIP and Leave groups are not racist in the first instance. We’re a tolerant country; despite recent events. The resurgent nationalism and lack of solidarity across only seems to benefit those who would want a fractured EU, e.g. Putin.
The issues up here have been over social cohesion and the rapid pace of change in jobs and especially job security. Although I agree that this has become a major problem, I’m still more inclined to look at the process of globalisation having a larger effect on this than the EU; if anything the EU will ameliorate the drop to living standards this is going to cause.
The lack of vision, the chaotic and imposed way they have gone about the development of the EU has been a failure. It’s in dire need of a reboot based around the people, not corporate need.
LikeLike
Thanks for your thoughtful and considered reply to my comment. I am something of an old-school 1970s Commie. Thrown out of Labour for being in Militant Tendency, now getting old, and tired of all the Blairites, and their clones. This is my other blog. You might be interested. If not, no problem.
https://redflagflying.wordpress.com/
Regards from Norfolk. Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Followed and will keep an eye!
LikeLike
In regards to the group mentality that you mentioned; I think it is inevitable. You could call it human nature. The Arabs have a saying for it: “I, against my brothers. I and my brothers against my cousins. I and my brothers and my cousins against the world.” I feel like people of the first world have difficulty understanding this because they have not been exposed to it. For many people in this world, the struggle to exist is part of their experience. In that way, they have some important wisdom. We live in a finite world and already there is not enough to go around. Luckily for you and me, we have first class tickets on spaceship earth. However, that will not keep us safe forever. Sooner or later (I expect it will be sooner) there will be an event which places dramatic stress on our system. There will simply not be enough to go around, even some of the first class folks will lose out. When that time comes, we should each hope to have surrounded ourselves with a group which will protect us. The altruists will be the first casualties. If one does not look out for himself, nobody else will. Europe may not be saved in it’s entirety but the UK can persist if it looks out for itself. Just a few minutes until the vote… crossing fingers
LikeLiked by 1 person
The chances of Western society regressing as in the Dark Ages is a possibility; there have been a few European authors who have postulated the idea like Houellebecq. We have time to turn this situation around; climate change is likely to force mass migration to safer and more prosperous spots, much like the movement away from the dustbowl created in ancient Persia.
The effect this will have on society is up to us. Regarding resources, although we are as yet not approaching a post-scarcity world the technologies are rapidly catching up. Vertical farming in Japan, GMOs and lab grown foods should see the food situation manageable in the medium term. Power generation is integral to the European project; there are plans to use the wide open spaces for greener technologies, to power Europe from within. But this pan-Europe grid will only work with us staying in the EU and being a generator rather than a purchaser.
There’s a lot more to the EU than demographics and trade. In future, it seems inevitable than humanity will cluster together into larger and larger blocks. Whether this situation becomes an uneasy equilibrium like in Orwell’s 1984 but based on trade initially, or something far more open and less easy to manipulate is what must be considered now. The corporate nature of the EU has two effects; it holds the EU to ransom, over jobs and prosperity, but on the positive side it has created a more ‘open’ world. The balance between corporate technocratic and capital power and the democratic power of the people themselves is very much in flux at the moment.
Big day for the country today; there’s been a lot of talk. The main thing is that people get out and vote regardless. Be involved; apathy has ruled here for some time and at least people are actively part of the process, even if only for a day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
On human nature, I’m less inclined to believe in a lack of built in altruism in all of us more that altruism in the past has been ignored in favour of survival; but as recent generations show in the West, skills and considerations of survival have come second to other ideas – human rights, freedom of thought and religion and a whole host of other things. Altruism is a rising trend, even if initially based out of a self-interest (e.g. the flower power generation in the 60s).
LikeLike
I like your article as a concerned citizen. Your ratiocination, analytical insight is well appreciated, Though the world is becoming integrated as a global village, there are complex differences, I am really concerned about the fate of Britain and I still do not know or have the faintest reason why they chose to leave the union. It’s better for Europe to stay as a whole than be balkanized.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Speaking about this with my wife, there’s still a sense of being islanders here that you forget sometimes. With the upset in France and now Turkey, it’s now more than ever that we stand together and don’t become splintered.
LikeLiked by 1 person